3 ms·
I can anecdotally agree with him. I ran a service that did a lot of media encoding and VP9 is very, very slow to encode.
by Sir_Cmpwn 11y ago
I can anecdotally agree with him. I ran a service that did a lot of media encoding and VP9 is very, very slow to encode.
- DarkLinkXXXX 11y agoCould that be due to lack of hardware support?
- TD-Linux 11y agoNo, generally encoding is done in software. It's just because VP9 is a much more complex format with many more different coding possibilities to search. It also hasn't been around as long as x264 to be hyper-optimized.
- astrange 11y agoThere are probably some issues with missing SIMD, but no further hardware support would be helpful. It's purely an implementation issue - you don't get software as good as x264 just by paying for it.
- mappu 11y agoComparing x264 to hardware-accelerated encoders (QuickSync, NVENC, VCE), the speed/quality/bitrate tradeoff is massively in favour of the cpu-only x264. So i think hardware encoding could help VP9, but it's not a magic bullet (unless your CPU is busy with other work simultaneously).