I think defining things as "true" and "false" is just as shackling though. You end up generalizing something that shouldn't be reduced to Boolean logic. You can

I think defining things as "true" and "false" is just as shackling though. You end up generalizing something that shouldn't be reduced to Boolean logic. You can't understand Wikipedia by looking at its bytecode, just as you can't understand a human by reading their genome. They're more than the sum of their parts.