So you're defending their practice of using ill-informed opinions made by people who don't understand the facts? I'm sorry, but that is not too much to ask of a

So you're defending their practice of using ill-informed opinions made by people who don't understand the facts? I'm sorry, but that is not too much to ask of a publication. I'm not talking about getting an expert, simply someone that understands the basics of encryption. Vance doesn't even understand the basic principles. It's like me writing an article about giving birth. I don't understand it because I'm not a woman. He doesn't understand encryption because he refuses to, didn't try, or is too stupid. Let's not pretend that stupidity rules the world when malice is a much more likely explanation.