The biggest error I see in the entire line of argument is that it assumes the author's experience to be generalizable. They might as well have said, "The system

The biggest error I see in the entire line of argument is that it assumes the author's experience to be generalizable. They might as well have said, "The system worked well for me. I didn't need any of these changes that are happening, so we should stop them. They're weakening our children because reasons." I can't take any of this seriously without any data to show there is a problem and not just complaints that amount to "I don't like how PC students are today." >As if the very act of registering for a class is traumatic event for which the student needs counselling. Clearly the author didn't go to a high-demand program at an impacted state school. "If you don't register for 12 units, your financial aid package will be revoked and you'll have to reapply for admission next term." Field Sciences, here I come! (True story.)