> the points were well made, at least from the perspective of a closed source, enterprise software vendor I understand the sarcasm, on the other hand it really

> the points were well made, at least from the perspective of a closed source, enterprise software vendor I understand the sarcasm, on the other hand it really confuses me that those points are mostly what makes closed-source unattractive and exactly what a closed source, enterprise software vendor would not want to discuss openly. At least that's what I thought before reading the article. I find it more likely that the blog was (maybe still is) compromised.