3 ms·
No it isn't. Clearly Google's management believes the new structure is accretive to shareholder value otherwise they wouldn't have done it. I really wonder abo
by eldavido 11y ago
No it isn't. Clearly Google's management believes the new structure is accretive to shareholder value otherwise they wouldn't have done it.
I really wonder about this though. Conglomerates have a mixed track record [1] and from where I sit, it's not clear Larry/Sergey are better capital allocators than the public markets.
[1] Brealey & Myers "Corporate Finance" has a good section on this topic, comparing big Asian conglomerates like Samsung, LG, Yahama, etc. to American public companies over time.
- Aloha 11y agoRegulatory costs can be an huge drain on long term profits, and I'd count anti-trust as a regulatory cost.