4 ms·
Surface navies are useless against competent organized opponents. Carrier groups are for power projection to scare the natives, little else. During a $250 milli
by ahi 17y ago
Surface navies are useless against competent organized opponents. Carrier groups are for power projection to scare the natives, little else. During a $250 million war game in 2002, OPFOR sunk the US fleet in the Persian Gulf. Sorry I can't find the original:
http://bassreport.com/forum/rec.boats.t664050.htm http://bassreport.com/forum/rec.boats.t664050.htm
And another from the War Nerd:
http://exiledonline.com/the-war-nerd-this-is-how-the-carriers-will-die/#more-6954 http://exiledonline.com/the-war-nerd-this-is-how-the-carrier...
He repeats this quote from the US Naval Institute about 10 times in that last article: "Ships currently have no defense against a ballistic missile attack," and points out that ballistic missiles are 50 year old tech.
The solution to defending a surface navy isn't to throw money at it, but to mothball it.
- sethg 17y agoThat is a rather glaring flaw in the OP’s argument, innit? “The Chinese could bring down one of our massive ships with one cheap missile! Therefore we need... an even larger quantity of massive ships than we have now!”