I didn't flag it, and I wasn't advocating that. I asked about tagging. Thanks for the plan on the FAQ. I'm sure it is just something you osmose being here for

I didn't flag it, and I wasn't advocating that. I asked about tagging. Thanks for the plan on the FAQ. I'm sure it is just something you osmose being here for a while. I'm sure if the article looked interesting enough I'd spend the time going through the standard workaround, but so far things haven't surpassed the 'does it look worth it' threshold, given how much interesting content there is that doesn't involve hoop-jumping. Which is why I think it might be a user-benefiting mandatory-tag, so people don't have to click through before finding that out, as [video], [pdf] and the year for old posts. At the very least people will know to copy the title into google rather than clicking through, hitting back, then copying it into search. Thanks for the upkeep of the site generally, also. It's such a good and interesting resource.