3 ms·
It seems like a science writer's scheme to tie theoretical physics to what "the informed reader" may have familiarity or interest in, ie. DNA, putting Schroding
by techbio 11y ago
It seems like a science writer's scheme to tie theoretical physics to what "the informed reader" may have familiarity or interest in, ie. DNA, putting Schrodinger and Crick in the same orbit.
Technically speaking, molecular interactions must rely on quantum effects, therefor the encoding does exist at the quantum level, as opposed to the applesauce level.
But this article is not really about genetics or applesauce.
- bdg 11y agoTo me the "quantum level" distinction is the issue. This is like saying you need to use Newtonian calculations for one set of speeds and Einstein's for another as if reality "switched gears" like a race car. The quantum level is the only level, all distinctions are purely in the mind. http://lesswrong.com/lw/pc/quantum_explanations/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/pc/quantum_explanations/