3 ms·
I'm hoping I'm reading this wrong. Because what I'm reading is "A database grew to 67GB on a server with only 66GB RAM". And apparently in that situation you ca
by technion 11y ago
I'm hoping I'm reading this wrong. Because what I'm reading is "A database grew to 67GB on a server with only 66GB RAM". And apparently in that situation you can expect performance to tank until a service is unusable?
- mjevans 11y agoYou did not read that wrong. The performance tanked because the working set now required a disk hit. Each, and every, query, required a disk hit. That many IOs/sec, irrespective of the size could be enough.