3 ms·

So your argument is that because it's hard (impossible?) to achieve a true meritocracy the term and goal itself is "bullshit" and should be dismissed? Should w

So your argument is that because it's hard (impossible?) to achieve a true meritocracy the term and goal itself is "bullshit" and should be dismissed? Should we apply the same standards to other common things? Equality? Democracy? Justice? See how that works? Yeah, it doesn't. Your argument is a non-argument.

DanBC 11y ago
No, my argument is that people who claim to be operating a meritocracy need to be aware of a bunch of biases or they risk being sexist[1] whilst also dismissing any accusations of sexism. [1] etc
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]