3 ms·
I was not arguing whether dogs with this level of success should be used or not. I was pointing out that the argument made in the essay misrepresented the facts
by harryh 11y ago
I was not arguing whether dogs with this level of success should be used or not. I was pointing out that the argument made in the essay misrepresented the facts. See my last sentence: "We can argue about whether that is good enough but comparing it to a coinflip makes no sense."
- elif 11y agoYour point is that it is not comparable from a "I caught more bad guys" standpoint, which is fair. But I think the other side: to say that a coin flip would punish less innocent people, makes it a fair comparison.
- niels_olson 11y agoEr, no. A coin flip would punish more innocent people. This is an argument of specificity, not sensitivity. The "screening" test, the "sensitive" test, was when the officer decided to involve Lex.
- merpnderp 11y agoNot if they've already been screened by the police. IE, if the cops only flip the coin once they would have brought in the dog, then it is no better than a coin flip.