> It seems completely ridiculous to call those two different markets. Finding the most relevant X on the web is fundamentally part of the same market no matter

> It seems completely ridiculous to call those two different markets. Finding the most relevant X on the web is fundamentally part of the same market no matter what X is. Yet in one case (general search) Google has a very large market share, whereas in the other case (e.g. product search), there is still plenty of competition with for example Amazon holding some share of that market. The idea is now that while it’s ok for Google to have such a large market share, it’s not ok for them to use that share in order to get another large market share which they don’t have at the moment. I.e. it’s acceptable for them to have a near-monopoly, but not to use that monopoly to build a second one.