It's not dismissal for the sake of dismissal. It's not even dismissal. It's pointing out incongruities in the corporate speech. There was enough specific inform

It's not dismissal for the sake of dismissal. It's not even dismissal. It's pointing out incongruities in the corporate speech. There was enough specific information in this post by the CEO of Coinbase to at least speculate and seriously consider my scenario. I was wrong about the possibility of it being a way to push early employees out. It's rather the opposite (duh! that is ostensibly why these ideas are being experimented with); Coinbase may decide that it wants to keep its early employees locked in. If these actions are being taken in support of employees, why not take a comprehensive approach that solves the entire problem? Or at least actually promise that the entire solution will follow shortly instead of saying it is only being considered. Anyway, I find the desire to reduce perceived negativity as misguided. The risk of an amplifying echochamber is real. Rather, it seems we should address root causes rather than superficial perceptions.