3 ms·
http://./ http://./ is a perfectly valid and very short URL, even though it is highly unlikely anyone (InterNIC? ICANN? Verisign?) would issue an address record
by noondip 11y ago
http://./ http://./ is a perfectly valid and very short URL, even though it is highly unlikely anyone (InterNIC? ICANN? Verisign?) would issue an address record for @. On a related note, has anyone seen ccTLDs do something like this (e.g., http://io./ http://io./, https://co.uk./foo https://co.uk./foo)?
- noinsight 11y ago> On a related note, has anyone seen ccTLDs do something like this (e.g., http://io./ http://io./, https://co.uk./foo https://co.uk./foo)? Yes, I wondered about this myself, http://dk http://dk. redirects to www.dk-hostmaster.dk. It would be interesting to receive mail from root@com or whatever :)
- nitrogen 11y agoThe Vatican advertises MX records on va.: $ dig va MX ... ;; ANSWER SECTION: va. 3599 IN MX 10 mx12.vatican.va. va. 3599 IN MX 10 mx11.vatican.va. va. 3599 IN MX 100 raphaelmx3.posta.va.
- noondip 11y agoCool! Anyone want to try emailing pope@va and seeing what comes of it?