4 ms·
Even that is a mediocre bug at best. Since wa deals with the infinitesimals as standard practice it could follow that they are showing the gap at 1.5 but it is
by weaksauce 17y ago
Even that is a mediocre bug at best. Since wa deals with the infinitesimals as standard practice it could follow that they are showing the gap at 1.5 but it is so small as not to display correctly or that the gap is smaller than the step size of the graph.
- jcl 17y agoIt's not just the graph. The solution given in the third box -- "x > 1" -- doesn't mention the gap either.