4 ms·
Someone needs to invent a "shoot to incapacitate" weapon (that is not a Taser). That said... we have the technology, today, to make a gun that automatically ta
by lectrick 11y ago
Someone needs to invent a "shoot to incapacitate" weapon (that is not a Taser).
That said... we have the technology, today, to make a gun that automatically targets, in a split second and with high accuracy, the arms and legs (and any other part) of a person. So why don't we just do that?
- branchan 11y ago1. Did you just not describe a taser? 2. Where is this weapon?
- lectrick 11y ago1) I specifically said not a Taser. A Taser has a number of negatives- short range, need for both contacts to penetrate adequately, small chance of death of subject 2) I do not know of one that exists, but I am sure that one is possible with today's technology. Perhaps I should gather a team and build it
- branchan 11y agoMy point exactly is there is no other practical or efficient weapon available or else one would be made already.