3 ms·
Is this not vulnerable to the horrible precedent on copyrightability of APIs, established by Oracle vs Google and which the SC just refused to review? https:/
by mrec 11y ago
Is this not vulnerable to the horrible precedent on copyrightability of APIs, established by Oracle vs Google and which the SC just refused to review?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_America,_Inc._v._Google,_Inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_America,_Inc._v._Google....
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/06/bad-news-supreme-court-refuses-review-oracle-v-google-api-copyright-decision https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/06/bad-news-supreme-court...
- perfectstorm 11y agoI've read that both Microsoft and Apple have agreed not to sue each other in court.
- mtgx 11y agoThat's convenient, but I don't think they made the same deal with Google (Project Astoria, the Android variation).
- ocdtrekkie 11y agoImagine how well it would go over for Google if they started a copyright suit from the position that they heavily argued against in Oracle. I'm not saying they wouldn't (or even shouldn't, since they lost the case), but I'd be amused as all get out. And it'd prove what we all know deep down: Google's position will always be whatever is the best position for Google.
- anonymfus 11y agoCan Oracle sue Microsoft?
- 0xCMP 11y agoNo definitely not. It's not their code. They can't sue for others without their cooperation. And Apple doesn't need Oracle to fight their battles.
- tsycho 11y agoPersonally, I find it more amusing that you speculate a situation that hasn't happened, and has no precedent from Google's history, and then use that to confirm a speculation which "we all know deep down" :)
- ocdtrekkie 11y agoWell, I said "it'd", which is short for "it would". As in, it would confirm, if they did.
- amlgsmsn 11y agoWouldn't this be translating one API to another, versus implementing an API as in Oracle vs. Google? Wonder if that makes a difference.