4 ms·

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EFForg/privacybadgerchrome/master/doc/sample_cookieblocklist.txt https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EFForg/privacybadgerchrome.

• joosters 11y ago
  Thanks! Some of the entries seem suspect, e.g. YouTube.com - why do they think that Google won't track you through pages with YouTube embedded items?
  • schoen 11y ago
    The entries there are things that seemed especially important for sites' functionality; they are supposed to be there as a result of these criteria: https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadgerfirefox/blob/master/yellowlist-criteria.txt https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadgerfirefox/blob/master/y... If you don't want something to be on the list, you can also override it in your own copy of Privacy Badger.
    • joosters 11y ago
      It still seems odd. Most users who install the extension aren't going to carefully read an obscure GitHub page, they will wrongly assume that they are now protected, while the 'yellow' list of very common sites is still allowing many big companies to continue to track them. That seems wrong to me.