4 ms·
so how do you propose to measure this "social interaction" model? And are you really, seriously, running the "no mechanism" claim about RF induced bioeffects?
by Gnarl 11y ago
so how do you propose to measure this "social interaction" model? And are you really, seriously, running the "no mechanism" claim about RF induced bioeffects?
- maxerickson 11y agoI don't propose to measure it, I don't really have a lot of interest in the issue. I'm also not making a no mechanism claim. I'm pointing out that the magnitude you stated is insufficient information to draw any sort of conclusion. You (apparently) want people to be alarmed at a large number. A large number is not a good reason to be alarmed. A large number coupled with an explanatory model as to the effects that the large number can have might be a reason to be alarmed, but the number itself just has a lot of zeros.
- Gnarl 11y ago@maverickson: this just in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230
- maxerickson 11y agoI guess you misunderstand what I mean by an explanatory model. It would be something like: sleep deprivation=(x*RF intensity)+A Constant. Without x, we have no idea how relevant the 10^18 is to the problem. So I'm not demanding a theory demonstrating that RF can influence biology, just pointing out that the magnitude of the change in RF is insufficient information to draw a conclusion from.