4 ms·
Honest question: Why don't the clouds seen on Earth show any activity or movement over the course of this time lapse?
by kenbellows 11y ago
Honest question: Why don't the clouds seen on Earth show any activity or movement over the course of this time lapse?
- LesZedCB 11y agoIt's only about 20 pictures at 30 second intervals each, which is only 10 minutes. From a million miles away, you wouldn't see noticeable changes in ten minutes. Much like when you are flying in a plane over the ocean and the waves look still.
- lyschoening 11y agoThe pictures were taken over 5 hours. You can see that the satellite is in a stationary position over the day side of earth.
- mxfh 11y agoThere definitely is some movement: Look at the fine features of the northern arm of the vortex in the South, they change quite a bit. Also, there are some clouds growing just east of the Gulf of California. [EDIT] As it's arguably hard to spot with the low frame rate and movement I uploaded a stabilized and sped up version. It's centered on a cloud patch in the Pacific. You can now clearly see a cloud west of it disappear as well as a lot of movement in that jet stream(?) next to it. http://i.imgur.com/Sg28xqu.gifv http://i.imgur.com/Sg28xqu.gifv (legacy GIF 8MB: http://i.imgur.com/Sg28xqu.gif http://i.imgur.com/Sg28xqu.gif) Closeup: http://i.imgur.com/wYfbnoU.gifv http://i.imgur.com/wYfbnoU.gifv
- Cthulhu_ 11y agoIf at all possible, please link to .gifv versions of imgur links; the .gif is a whopping 4.4 MB (compressed, 8.8 MB uncompressed), vs 737 KB as .webm in the gifv version. TL;DR: do not use .gif as a video format.
- mxfh 11y agoCC: NASA
- mixmastamyk 11y agoWow that looks much better than the original.