2 ms·
For lack of a better word, this implementation is half-assed. If the whole point is typography that's both gorgeous and legible, then you had better dot your i
by jpatokal 11y ago
For lack of a better word, this implementation is half-assed. If the whole point is typography that's both gorgeous and legible, then you had better dot your i's and cross your t's, and this doesn't. As a very simple example, look at the capital B here in the name of the font:
http://snag.gy/yup65.jpg http://snag.gy/yup65.jpg
There's a chunk missing at the top, and it looks like crap! It should look like this:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/BemboMT.svg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/BemboMT....
Now I understand full well that it's very difficult to make something that looks good on every OS, browser, screen size, resolution, yadda yadda -- but in this case, that's the entire point!