4 ms·
> "It's ridiculous the sense of entitlement parents have." It's not a sense of entitlement that drives these kinds of changes. It's a recognition that child re
by ux-app 11y ago
> "It's ridiculous the sense of entitlement parents have."
It's not a sense of entitlement that drives these kinds of changes. It's a recognition that child rearing is an important societal activity, and that in a modern, privileged, civilized society we should not have workplace policies in place that are hostile toward parents. Ageing populations are a real and present threat to many first world countries. In most western countries this is recognized at the governmental level with leave schemes, childcare subsidies etc.
This is also in response to changes in work patterns. In the 50s it was very uncommon for both mother and father to be working. Now the opposite is the case. Shouldn't society then move to restore the balance in a sense by applying what you call "special benefits" to parents?
- aianus 11y agoThe entitlement was evident in his footnote "please do not equate having a baby to pursuing a hobby." I should have been more specific that parents should not be entitled to special benefits at work. It would make sense for a government program to subsidize child rearing to some extent.