3 ms·
Referencing their less than rigorous journalism track record recently: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/04/06/rolling-stone-isnt-firing-anyone
by ErikRogneby 11y ago
Referencing their less than rigorous journalism track record recently: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/04/06/rolling-stone-isnt-firing-anyone-thats-terrible-for-journalism/ http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/04/06/rol...
- dredmorbius 11y agoRecently, Will Dana, RS's editor at the time of the UV story has left: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/30/business/media/will-dana-rolling-stones-managing-editor-to-depart.html http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/30/business/media/will-dana-r... Yes, that was a massive fuck-up. Yes, it exposed bad practices. It still strikes me as a case of being manipulated by a source bent on deception to whom excess deference was given, not intent to deceive by RS itself.