5 ms·
> Air France 440 was also shrouded in mystery (but nowhere near this degree), and turned out to be very poor airmanship by one pilot. It was flight 447. https:
by neurotech1 11y ago
> Air France 440 was also shrouded in mystery (but nowhere near this degree), and turned out to be very poor airmanship by one pilot.
It was flight 447. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_447 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_447
IMO The mystery of MH370 is partially due to some incorrect assumptions, which can't be proven or disproven until the main wreckage is found, and/or the blackboxes recovered.
Where the wreckage ended up could depend several factors.
eg. glide ratio of a 777 (~18:1), or how the 777 Fly-by-wire control system works under certain failure modes. There hasn't been a crew incapacitation crash in a fly-by-wire airliner before.
A small fire in the electrical bay could disable aircraft systems in unexpected ways, and possibly even burn out on its own, and the damage doesn't actually cause the jet to crash immediately. If the cockpit crew were incapacitated at cruise altitude, the jet could still end up 100 miles away from the point the engines flamed out.
- ProblemFactory 11y agoPart of the mystery is due to the radical change in the flight path. It was supposed to fly North from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. But for some reason, the plane was turned around, and flew towards the Indian Ocean instead of China for at least an hour: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/MH370_flight_path_with_English_labels.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/MH370_fl... Merely incompetent crew or a technical failure would not cause that - it has to either be a hijacking or an unstable pilot doing it on purpose.
- Steko 11y agoTurning around is a common procedure under mechanical events and mechanical explanations for what happened to MH370 are still one of the leading 2 theories.