> Not all, only where authors so openly insert modern political views into historical situations. And who decides if they "so openly" do that? Apparently you t

> Not all, only where authors so openly insert modern political views into historical situations. And who decides if they "so openly" do that? Apparently you think it is happening here, while to me, your perspective seems very puzzling. You appear to be looking for something so hard, you find it even when it isn't there. Where did this article inject opinion? The part you so take issue with, the closing, is a literal quote.