3 ms·
> I feel I should note that Walker exempted police unions from his union-busting. OK, eww, yeah, Walker was wrong then. Fundamentally, forming a union is an a
by amyjess 11y ago
> I feel I should note that Walker exempted police unions from his union-busting.
OK, eww, yeah, Walker was wrong then.
Fundamentally, forming a union is an act against your employer's interests. When your employer is a private entity, that's not a big deal. It's a dispute between two private parties, let them hash it out amongst themselves.
But when your employer is the government, forming a union is an act against the public's interests. Public servants should never, ever be allowed to act against the public's interests under any circumstances. And this goes double when your job is a fundamental part of public safety. It's why Reagan fired the air traffic controllers: because such a group going on strike is a direct attack on public safety. Imagine if there was a police department that actually did their jobs instead of choking black people to death on the streets; now imagine that "good" police department suddenly went on strike because of a pay dispute. Imagine how many people calling 911 for domestic violence, home invasions, etc. would be completely and thoroughly screwed.
Police unions simply are incompatible with public safety.
- logfromblammo 11y agoIf you frame this in terms of freedom of association versus public safety, my preference is to choose the former. ~If the cops go on strike, we can always contract city security out to OCP and their clever robots.~