4 ms·
I'd say for VR it's definitely an improvement. Resolutions will get better. More power will get cheaper. I think we realize that to have immersion we absolutel
by curiousjorge 11y ago
I'd say for VR it's definitely an improvement. Resolutions will get better. More power will get cheaper.
I think we realize that to have immersion we absolutely need accessories. Haptic bodysuits and gloves. Simulate tacticle sensations and feedbacks digitally. Firing a shotgun resulting in your arms moving back as if you just fired a shotgun.
Next we can have some sort of stationary hamster ball where you could move about in complete freedom suspended in air. It would rotate to give you an illusion of gravity. The haptic bodysuit would give you the feeling that you are standing on the ground or in a race car or a spaceship.
Why stop there? Nanomachine solution you would drink and allow you to eat food in your VR and taste it.
The possibilities are endless but so are the unique challenges each of these necessary component of VR.
OR there was a way to fire some sort of lucid dream world but controlled by a software. You would know you are dreaming but you would be completely caught up in that VR world generated with the help of your own brain. Everything feels real, but what if people neglect their own bodies, wanting to be in the world as long as possible.