I like to visualize code quality as a point on a triangle with corners labeled "readable", "extensible", and "performant." Most of what is considered "low-quali

I like to visualize code quality as a point on a triangle with corners labeled "readable", "extensible", and "performant." Most of what is considered "low-quality" code is biased towards one side of the triangle, and most code quality advice tends towards over-correcting that bias towards another corner of the triangle. What I love about this presentation is that it's not advice -- it's a collection of tools for your perusal. Use at your own discretion. A lot of quote-unquote "high-quality" Ruby code I've seen is either biased towards readability, biased towards extensibility, or sitting somewhere on the edge between the two. So I really do think every Ruby developer should at least glance at this collection and be familiar with it.