3 ms·
I've been working on something like this as well and the biggest problem that I have found is that there is a hard limit of 100 S3 buckets per aws account. Whic
by jpatters 11y ago
I've been working on something like this as well and the biggest problem that I have found is that there is a hard limit of 100 S3 buckets per aws account. Which, unfortunately makes it impossible to use S3 in the manner I had intended.
- tigroferoce 11y agoAWS has hard limits, but usually can be easily overcome just by asking to their support. We increased many times the hard limits on EC2 instances and EIP.
- pas256 11y agoThat's true, but the S3 bucket limit, just like the VPC security group limit, is fixed at 100, even if you are Netflix. --- Edit: Wow, what a difference a day makes.
- mwarkentin 11y agoThey actually just changed this yesterday: http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2015/08/amazon-s3-introduces-new-usability-enhancements/ http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2015/08/amazon-s3-... > Bucket Limit Increase: You can now increase your Amazon S3 bucket limit per AWS account. All AWS accounts have a default bucket limit of 100 buckets, and starting today you can now request additional buckets by visiting AWS Service Limits.
- connorleech 11y agolook into namespacing your buckets. a bucket is not the same as a table. aws works in massive scale production and can suit all kinds of needs. the good folks at the aws popup loft in SF set me straight on this one
- jpatters 11y agoUnfortunately namespacing won't work for us. We need the ability to point a domain name at a bucket. Can't do that with a folder inside a bucket. If I am incorrect on this, it would be great if you could set me straight too.