10 ms·
In the developing world fuel logistics are a major cost. Local solar+battery is quickly cheaper in the long run in areas where infrastructure is lacking. Howeve
by jerven 11y ago
In the developing world fuel logistics are a major cost. Local solar+battery is quickly cheaper in the long run in areas where infrastructure is lacking. However, access to capital is a major challenge. i.e. the upfront costs means the cheaper system does not get deployed.
It is quite common that a family could afford 1$ of fuel a month for kerosene lamps, but not the 20$ for a solar charged battery led lamp. As the 20$ even if a great investment after 2 years is out of reach.
Solar starts to make a whole lot of sense if there is no or only a primitive grid to hook into. i.e. compare the boom of mobile phone use in Africa.
A KM of high quality copper wire is not cheap, either. To a central powerplant, distribution of fossil fuel to decentralized power plants is very expensive and very wasteful.
The economically developing world has a great problem in accessing capital, not in investing it usefully.
- __Joker 11y agoUpfront cost is a major factor, which I have noticed firsthand while involved in the solar powered backup. It is almost you have to pay 20x for the solar powered back up. It is pretty difficult to convince the people in the developing world to go for solar, where environment factor most of the time is not a cause of concern for the consumer.
- pjc50 11y agoThere has been some work on leased panels with built-in microbilling, so the user doesn't have to pay the upfront cost. From a western point of view it's nasty to have a locked down piece of technology that requires you to insert coin to keep it working, but when people have no access to the alternatives it seems more reasonable.