3 ms·
I use MathWorld too but it's limited for my purposes, which includes conceptual understanding: Its articles tend toward strict definitions and not concepts, som
by hackuser 11y ago
I use MathWorld too but it's limited for my purposes, which includes conceptual understanding: Its articles tend toward strict definitions and not concepts, some terms I lookup are omitted, and unless you already are familiar with the term defined then it can be hard to comprehend.
Compare, for example:
* http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ModelTheory.html http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ModelTheory.html
* http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/model-theory/ http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/model-theory/
EDIT: Replaced the examples with better ones
- brobdingnagian 11y agoScholarpedia is another good and authoritative source. The articles are typically written by the person who created the concept, or an active authority: http://www.scholarpedia.org http://www.scholarpedia.org
- kensai 11y agoIndeed, one of the most authoritative sources. They should expand the fields treated, imo.