I understand what you're saying about the good fortune of people who live in public housing in desirable areas. And I see what you mean about the benefits of sp

I understand what you're saying about the good fortune of people who live in public housing in desirable areas. And I see what you mean about the benefits of spreading some of that good fortune around by selling parking. Both of these may be good reasons to support Bloomberg's plan. But I don't see what any of this has to do with your assertions about the rationality/wisdom of residents who oppose the plan: > The plan was bitterly opposed by residents who apparently value massively subsidized parking over non-falling-down buildings and/or believe that the money is going to magically appear in some other way. > DeBlasio has put out a modified version of the same plan . . . [which] will mean less money for NYCHA, which means fewer repairs, but I guess he doesn't care.