3 ms·
Ooh goodie, we get to re-open the argument about whether it was bad of GitHub to publish the public keys![1] Pick your talking points: "They're called public f
by scintill76 11y ago
Ooh goodie, we get to re-open the argument about whether it was bad of GitHub to publish the public keys![1] Pick your talking points: "They're called public for a reason.", "This could enable identity tracking.", "If your security model prefers public keys to be kept secret, it's absurd -- security by obscurity.", "This could enable factoring weak keys.", "This is good for security research.", "It's wrong to reveal metadata without consent, even if it doesn't break the crypto."
You could build in another PoC by doing the trick where you hide a command inside the copy-paste version of the ssh command line you gave.[2]
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9645703 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9645703
[2] https://thejh.net/misc/website-terminal-copy-paste https://thejh.net/misc/website-terminal-copy-paste