> I will still not say that reasonable people can't disagree over the question at hand but the arguments presented in this article don't strike me as being anyw

> I will still not say that reasonable people can't disagree over the question at hand but the arguments presented in this article don't strike me as being anywhere near strong enough to make this the sort of grey area the author would like. I didn't think it was that hard to read. It made sense on my first read, but here's my translation: "I can see how arguments exist on both sides, but I don't think the author supported his argument with enough evidence to make it very relevant."