3 ms·
"And that was it" .. so far. I think they're getting a little ahead of themselves to assume they're in the clear simply because they haven't heard anything.
by justonepost 11y ago
"And that was it" .. so far. I think they're getting a little ahead of themselves to assume they're in the clear simply because they haven't heard anything.
Unless they did hear something extremely definitive and simply decided not to share that with us in the way they did the command letter.
- AnimalMuppet 11y agoLet's see. The subpoena was issued on June 12, 2015. They were supposed to appear before the grand jury on July 1, 2015. The article was posted on August 4, 2015. So they clearly missed appearing before the grand jury on July 1, and didn't get arrested for it. But yeah, it's a bit too soon to assume that no other shoes are going to drop...
- wtallis 11y agoThere's only one other shoe that could drop, which would be an assertion that hosting a Tor exit node is illegal in general. I doubt the Feds want to argue that directly where it could be directly opposed.
- AnimalMuppet 11y agoNo, the other shoe could be that they get a subpoena for all their logs of any form on the Tor machine or any machine connected to it, or something of that order.