2 ms·
I love these kinds of old blog posts. I admire the approach and dedication, but it feels a bit redundant. Aside from the future dated directories, some creativ
by gabesullice 11y ago
I love these kinds of old blog posts.
I admire the approach and dedication, but it feels a bit redundant. Aside from the future dated directories, some creative use of the find command could achieve a lot of this.
The problem really reminds me of inheritance vs. composition. Like inheritance, file hierarchy encourages narrow classification and makes shared traits difficult to manage. Tagging for file organization seems like a much more elegant solution, letting an article or files categorization be a sum of its basic properties. Services like Pocket have adopted that approach for a reason I think.
I haven't looked, but I'd love to see a tag based file system tool. One could easily imagine having a nested tree of tags where one would be able to navigate down to a file via multiple directory paths.
Edit: Evidently, this is called a semantic file system:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_file_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_file_system
and
Tagsistant looks a lot like what I was imagining:
http://www.tagsistant.net/ http://www.tagsistant.net/
- ics 11y agoTMSU (http://tmsu.org/ http://tmsu.org/) and git-annex (https://git-annex.branchable.com/ https://git-annex.branchable.com/) also allow for different tag-based filing methods. OS X has had native file tagging for at least a version or two now as well, though it's less helpful with many tags.