3 ms·
Their reasoning seems pretty clear "Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort." It's worth noting tha
by alexqgb 11y ago
Their reasoning seems pretty clear "Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort."
It's worth noting that "privilege" comes from the Latin for "private law", which is to say a law that established a code of conduct for one class that was not applied to another. Typically, this took the form of exempting some people from the laws that bound everyone else.
In other words, the life under conditions of privilege was far freer and and more forgiving than it was for everyone else. The result was a set of advantages that made it easy for those with privilege to maintain it, and difficult for those without privilege to acquire it.
What's remarkable about this document is the way it illuminates the extraordinary number and range of ways in which privilege - and its attendant social ordering functions - can express itself. In other words, simply countering it, to say nothing of dismantling it, is a non-trivial task.
Understanding privilege in this way also makes it easy to see why the very concept of "reverse racism" is so ridiculous. In essence, it's based on a profound misunderstanding of what racism is in the first place. It is not simply a matter of treating different people differently. It is about embedding race in a system of privilege, which is something you cannot do unless you have privilege in the first place (obviously, allowing those without privilege to define its benefits would defeat the whole purpose). In other words, racism is about propagating a deeply established social hierarchy of dominance and submission that is based on race. To the extent that "reverse racism" seeks to limit the power of these structures, it's a good thing. In any case, the problem is the continued existence of the unjust power structure, and not the fact that people pay attention to who does and does not receive its protection.
In Western countries, privilege has generally meant straight, white, men, from well-off backgrounds making life much easier for each other while making it much more difficult for everyone else. Sure, there are exceptions. But they're few and far between, with their scarcity only serving to underscore the general rule. And while plenty of individuals who are a part of this class may find the structure distasteful, that's had limited effect on the structure itself, which remains largely dominant to this day.
In any case, it's not going to dismantle itself, so it's up to the people who do want to do something about it to actually do something about it. Saying "we're not going to defend it, and given a choice, we're going to rule against it" is a good example.
That may be very unsettling for some people, but understand this: if you're getting grief the problem is probably not that you're a straight, white guy. More likely, the problem is that you're treating other people like garbage in more ways than you can even imagine, and doing so habitually because your privilege allows you to get away with it.
And yes, a place that explicitly says "your privilege is not respected here" can be a tricky one for some people to navigate. If you're not much of a jerk to begin with, it isn't a big deal. But if you're a deep-fried, hard-boiled asshole who cannot even imagine how to treat others with a suitable measure of civility and respect, yes, you're going to suffer.
- 13thLetter 11y ago"That may be very unsettling for some people, but understand this: the problem is not that you're a straight, white guy. The problem is that you're a horrible fucking asshole who treats other people like garbage in more ways than you can even imagine." This sounds a lot like the doctrine of original sin. "If you're not much of a jerk to begin with, this isn't a big deal." And this sounds an awful lot like "If you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear."
- alexqgb 11y agoI don't know why you would say that. This isn't some faceless and inhumane government bureaucracy. It's just other people trying to live their lives in the world without having the more unpleasant members of the privileged class shit on them reflexively.
- cperciva 11y agoIt's worth noting that "privilege" comes from the Latin for "private law", which is to say a law that established a code of conduct for one class that was not applied to another. Typically, this took the form of exempting some people from the laws that bound everyone else. Sounds to me like "it's wrong for you to discriminate on the basis of race, but it's fine when I do it" fits perfectly into the definition of privilege here.
- alexqgb 11y agoIt's only wrong if you strip it of all context. In the real world, which is defined by deep and ancient legacies, things are very different. In in America circa 2015, where the status quo is inherently wrong and racist, it's wrong to consider race when doing so propagates the status quo. At the same time, it is right to consider race when seeking to frustrate or dismantle the status quo. Both judgements rest on the same principle, which is that the status quo is inherently wrong and racist. So you see? There's no double standard. Of course, if you can't already see the injustice built into the status quo, then efforts to counter it are going to appear baseless and suspect. But given all the evidence to the contrary, that would take a pretty extraordinary act of willful blindness.